Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsDaniel Stoller, Sebastian Ewert, Simon Dixon (Queen Mary University of London / Spotify)/10 trustVerified

Wave-U-Net

The 2018 classic that proved you can separate music straight from the waveform — the first true end-to-end neural stem splitter.

Visit official page →

About

Wave-U-Net was the paper that asked whether separation even needs a spectrogram. Instead of the usual STFT-magnitude pipeline (which throws away phase and depends on front-end hyperparameters), it adapts the U-Net to the raw 1D waveform: repeated downsampling and upsampling blocks compute features at multiple time scales, with an output layer that enforces source additivity and a context-aware prediction framework to suppress boundary artifacts.\n\nOn singing-voice separation it matched the then-state-of-the-art spectrogram U-Net on the same data, and it entered the SiSEC 2018 campaign as submissions STL1/STL2. The best released vocal model (M5-HighSR) self-reports median 4.95 dB vocal / 11.16 dB accompaniment SDR — modest by 2024 standards, but this was the proof of concept that made Demucs and every waveform separator after it thinkable.\n\nThe repo is MIT with pretrained models, and it is still one of the most-cited separation papers. It is thoroughly superseded for production use, but as the historical foundation of end-to-end separation it belongs in any catalog.

Specs

Context window

Raw waveform windows; full songs via context-aware chunked prediction

Pricing

Free / open weights

Free quota

Fully open — no API

API access

No official API — MIT code and pretrained models at f90/Wave-U-Net

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • Author-reported (ISMIR 2018, arXiv 1806.03185): comparable to the state-of-the-art spectrogram U-Net on singing-voice separation with the same data\n- Author-reported: M5-HighSR best vocal model, median vocal SDR 4.95 dB / accompaniment 11.16 dB\n- Participated in SiSEC 2018 (STL1/STL2); 2018-era numbers, far below modern separators

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

vocal-isolationstem-splittingresearch-baselinewaveform-separation

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 7/10 (TIER verified, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed paper (ISMIR 2018, arXiv 1806.03185), MIT-licensed code with pretrained models, 940+ stars, SiSEC 2018 participation. Strengths: foundational end-to-end design, fully open, historically pivotal. Docked for: (1) 2018-era — separation quality far below modern models; (2) maintenance is archival. License: MIT.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
7.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
4.0/10
Openness · license + docs
10.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
7.0/10
  • · Peer-reviewed paper at ISMIR 2018 (arXiv 1806.03185) by Daniel Stoller, Sebastian Ewert, Simon Dixon (QMUL/Spotify): first end-to-end waveform U-Net for separation, with source-additivity output layer and context-aware prediction; matched the SOTA spectrogram U-Net on singing-voice separation.
  • · MIT code with pretrained models (M4, M6, M5-HighSR); 940+ stars; entered SiSEC 2018 as STL1/STL2.
  • · 2018-era numbers (best vocal model self-reports median 4.95 dB vocal SDR) — thoroughly superseded, included as the foundation of end-to-end separation.

Sources