Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsWeinan Tong et al. (Tsinghua University / Skywork AI)/10 trustVerified

SCNet

A sparse-compression separator that matches the big models at a fraction of the compute — 9 dB SDR on MUSDB18-HQ at half of HT Demucs' CPU time.

Visit official page →

About

SCNet attacks the efficiency problem in wide-band music separation. The observation: subbands carry very different amounts of information, so compressing them all equally wastes capacity. SCNet splits the spectrogram into subbands and applies a sparsity-based encoder that compresses information-sparse bands harder, densifying the signal where it matters and spending modeling budget on the bands that carry the music.\n\nThe authors report 9.0 dB SDR on MUSDB18-HQ without any extra training data — a state-of-the-art claim at publication — with CPU inference at only 48% of HT Demucs' time. The large variant (SCNet-L) scores 10.86 vocals / 10.98 drums / 9.49 bass / 7.44 other in a third-party comparison table from the Moises-Light paper. ZFTurbo's Music-Source-Separation-Training framework ships trained SCNet checkpoints, which is how most people actually run it.\n\nThe paper was accepted at ICASSP 2024, the code is MIT, and checkpoints are public. It is a young line — the community is small and every headline number is still author-reported — but as an efficiency play it is one of the more interesting separators of 2024.

Specs

Context window

Wide-band audio chunks; full songs via overlap-add inference

Pricing

Free / open weights

Free quota

Fully open — no API

API access

No official API — MIT code at starrytong/SCNet; trained checkpoints via Google Drive and ZFTurbo's MSST releases

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • Author-reported (arXiv 2401.13276, ICASSP 2024): 9.0 dB SDR on MUSDB18-HQ without extra data; CPU inference 48% of HT Demucs\n- Third-party (Moises-Light paper, arXiv 2510.06785): SCNet-L averages 9.69 SDR (vocals 10.86, drums 10.98, bass 9.49, other 7.44) on MUSDB18-HQ\n- Young model line; no independent replication published yet

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

stem-splittingvocal-isolationefficient-inferencecpu-separation

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 7/10 (TIER verified, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed paper (ICASSP 2024, arXiv 2401.13276) from a named Tsinghua/Skywork team, MIT-licensed code and public checkpoints, and a third-party comparison (Moises-Light paper) corroborating strong numbers. Strengths: novel efficiency angle, open and reproducible, genuinely fast. Docked for: (1) young project with a small community; (2) SOTA claims are author-reported with no independent replication. License: MIT.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
6.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
6.0/10
Openness · license + docs
10.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
7.0/10
  • · Peer-reviewed paper accepted at ICASSP 2024 (arXiv 2401.13276, Jan 2024) from Weinan Tong et al. (Tsinghua / Skywork AI): sparsity-based encoder compressing information-sparse subbands harder; 9.0 dB SDR on MUSDB18-HQ without extra data at 48% of HT Demucs' CPU inference time (author-reported).
  • · Third-party corroboration: the Moises-Light paper (arXiv 2510.06785) reports SCNet-L at 9.69 avg SDR (vocals 10.86, drums 10.98, bass 9.49, other 7.44) on MUSDB18-HQ.
  • · MIT code and public checkpoints; young line with a small community; ZFTurbo's MSST framework ships trained checkpoints.

Sources