Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsBioMap Research/10 trustMetrics-checked

scFoundation

100M-parameter foundation model for single-cell transcriptomics, trained on 50M+ cells.

Visit official page →

About

scFoundation is a large-scale foundation model for single-cell RNA sequencing data, published in Nature Methods in 2024. It packs roughly 100 million parameters covering about 20,000 genes, pretrained on more than 50 million human single-cell expression profiles gathered from GEO, the Human Cell Atlas, Single Cell Portal and EMBL-EBI. Its backbone, xTrimoGene, uses an asymmetric transformer with a read-depth-aware masking objective so it stays robust to the wildly varying sequencing depths across labs and protocols.

The model is used as a plug-in representation: frozen or lightly adapted embeddings feed task-specific models for gene-expression enhancement, drug-response prediction, perturbation forecasting and cell-type annotation, where the authors report state-of-the-art results. Code and models are published on GitHub, though one independent review notes the public repo does not fully reproduce the original pretraining run — treat the released weights as a starting point, not a bit-exact replica of the paper's model.

Specs

Context window

Not applicable — input is a gene-expression vector of ~20,000 genes per cell

Pricing

Free / open weights

Free quota

Unlimited (self-hosted)

API access

No official hosted API; self-host from the biomap-research GitHub repo

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • Paper-reported (Nature Methods, doi 10.1038/s41592-024-02305-7): state-of-the-art on gene-expression enhancement, tissue and single-cell drug response, perturbation prediction and cell-type annotation
  • No independent standardized benchmark suite published

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

single-cell-genomicsdrug-response-predictionperturbation-predictioncell-type-annotationgene-expression-analysis

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (TIER metrics, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed Nature Methods paper (doi 10.1038/s41592-024-02305-7) with six downstream task families evaluated; public code + model repo (biomap-research/scFoundation); widely cited in single-cell foundation-model literature. Strengths: peer review, large-scale pretraining, broad downstream coverage. Docked for: (1) an independent review flags that the pretraining run is not fully reproducible from the public repo; (2) all headline numbers are author-reported. License: not confirmed in sources checked (see repo).

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
7.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
5.0/10
Openness · license + docs
6.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
7.0/10
  • · Nature Methods 2024 (doi 10.1038/s41592-024-02305-7); 100M params, ~20K genes, 50M+ cells
  • · Public repo biomap-research/scFoundation; independent review notes pretraining not fully reproducible from public repo
  • · Widely cited in single-cell foundation-model literature

Sources