Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsAnt Group (CodeFuse)/10 trustMetrics-checked
CodeFuse-CodeLlama-34B (MFTCoder) logo

CodeFuse-CodeLlama-34B (MFTCoder)

Ant Group's multi-task fine-tuned CodeLlama 34B: 74.4% HumanEval, beating GPT-4 in the authors' tests.

Visit official page →

About

MFTCoder is Ant Group's CodeFuse team framework for multi-task fine-tuning of code LLMs, and CodeFuse-CodeLlama-34B is its showcase model. The framework's pitch is that fine-tuning one model jointly across code tasks — code generation, translation, comments, test generation — beats separate per-task fine-tunes and beats naive mixed-data training, while handling data imbalance and differing convergence speeds across tasks. It accepts CodeLlama and Qwen bases and was presented at KDD 2024.

The model itself scored 74.4% pass@1 on HumanEval in the team's tests, ahead of GPT-4's 67% zero-shot, and the broader CodeFuse line reported HumanEval wins across sizes including CodeFuse-DeepSeek-33B at 78.7%. The framework, training data, and models are open sourced, and the CodeFuse project reported over 1.5 million model downloads on Hugging Face and ModelScope. The headline comparisons are vendor-run, but the KDD peer review adds credibility to the method.

Specs

Context window

Not published in surfaced materials

Pricing

Free / open weights (Apache 2.0 per CodeFuse releases)

Free quota

Free / open weights — self-host at no license cost

API access

Self-hosted via Hugging Face and ModelScope (codefuse-ai); MFTCoder training framework on GitHub

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • HumanEval: CodeFuse-CodeLlama-34B 74.4% pass@1 vs GPT-4 67% zero-shot (provider-reported, paper)
  • HumanEval: CodeFuse-DeepSeek-33B 78.7% (provider-reported, MFTCoder repo table)
  • HumanEval: CodeFuse-13B 37.1% (provider-reported, CodeFuse paper)

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

code-generationcode-translationtest-generationmulti-task-fine-tuningchinese-code-tasks

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed KDD 2024 paper (arXiv:2311.02303) with an open framework, released data, and models; 1.5M+ downloads reported on HF/ModelScope. Strengths: novel multi-task fine-tuning method with peer review, strong reported scores, active CodeFuse ecosystem. Docked for: (1) all GPT-4 comparisons are vendor-run with no independent replication surfaced; (2) per-model license terms were not re-verified from the model cards — confirm Apache 2.0 before commercial use.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
8.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
7.0/10
Openness · license + docs
8.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
6.0/10
  • · KDD 2024 peer-reviewed; 1.5M+ reported HF/ModelScope downloads
  • · All GPT-4 comparisons vendor-run

Sources