Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsGAIR (Generative AI Research)/10 trustMetrics-checked

LIMO

The 'less is more' reasoning model — 817 curated examples eliciting 57% AIME from a 32B base.

Visit official page →

About

LIMO is the paper that made the reasoning world argue about data. Conventional wisdom said complex reasoning needs 100K+ training examples; the GAIR team showed that 817 meticulously curated demonstrations — long, high-quality chains of thought on hard math problems — could take Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct to 57.1% on AIME and 94.8% on MATH500.

The deeper claim is the Less-Is-More Reasoning Hypothesis: once pretraining has packed in the knowledge, post-training mostly needs to show the model how to organize its thinking, and a few perfect templates beat a mountain of mediocre ones. The model, dataset and eval code are all on Hugging Face. One flag for careful users: the repo declares no license, so the legal terms for reuse are genuinely unclear.

Specs

Context window

32K (Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct base)

Pricing

Free / open weights (no license declared)

Free quota

Fully open — no API

API access

No official API — self-host from Hugging Face (GAIR/LIMO)

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • Paper-reported (arXiv 2502.03387): 57.1% AIME24, 94.8% MATH500 with 817 training samples (1% of prior data budgets)
  • Same paper: +40.5pp absolute improvement over 100x-data baselines across 10 benchmarks

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

mathematical-reasoningreasoning-researchdata-efficiency

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (TIER metrics, metrics-v1). Evidence: paper (arXiv 2502.03387) with 10-benchmark evals; open weights and 817-sample dataset on Hugging Face (GAIR/LIMO); influential in the RLVR/data-efficiency debate. Strengths: striking, well-documented result; fully reproducible artifacts. Docked for: (1) no license declared on the HF repo — reuse terms unclear; (2) headline numbers are author-reported; (3) repo activity is quiet. License: none declared.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
6.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
5.0/10
Openness · license + docs
6.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
7.0/10
  • · GAIR; released 2025-02-05
  • · Paper arXiv 2502.03387; 57.1% AIME24 with 817 samples
  • · Benchmarks are author-reported; repo quiet since release

Sources