Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsKe Sun, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, Jingdong Wang (Microsoft Research Asia, University of Science and Technology of China)/10 trustVerified

HRNet

The parallel multi-resolution backbone that reset pose accuracy records at CVPR 2019.

Visit official page →

About

HRNet changed how pose backbones are designed: instead of downsampling and then recovering resolution, it keeps a high-resolution stream alive through the whole network, adding lower-resolution streams in parallel and fusing them repeatedly. The result is position-sensitive features that are unusually good at precise keypoint localization.

It broke three COCO records on release and became the default backbone inside HigherHRNet, HybrIK, and a generation of top-down pose models. The TPAMI journal version generalized the idea beyond pose to classification, detection, and segmentation. Accuracy-wise it has since been passed, but the design is still a fixture in the field.

Specs

Context window

Image input (256x192 / 384x288 standard configs; 17 COCO keypoints as backbone)

Pricing

Free — research code and pretrained weights

Free quota

N/A (self-hosted weights)

API access

No hosted API — self-hosted weights (PyTorch and other ports)

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

Provider-reported (CVPR 2019 paper): 77.7 AP on COCO test-dev with the W48 backbone; widely used as the baseline other models compare against, but no single independent benchmark of HRNet itself as a product was found.

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

human-pose-estimationpose-backbonesemantic-segmentationdense-predictionmesh-recovery-backbone

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 8/10 (verified, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed CVPR 2019 paper and TPAMI journal extension by named MSRA/USTC researchers; foundational and enormously cited; code and weights publicly available. Strengths: strong provenance, foundational influence, real code and weights. Docked for: (1) I could not verify the exact license of the official release in this pass; (2) superseded in raw accuracy by newer models. License: not verified — treat weights as research-use pending confirmation.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
10.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
5.0/10
Openness · license + docs
6.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
9.0/10
  • · CVPR 2019 (Sun, Xiao, Liu, Wang; MSRA/USTC); parallel multi-resolution design, TPAMI journal extension.
  • · Provider-claimed 77.7 AP COCO test-dev (W48); foundational, still a default backbone (HigherHRNet, HybrIK).
  • · Accuracy since surpassed by newer models.

Sources