Skip to content
← Models
ClosedSpaceXAI/10 trustVerified

Grok 4.7

SpaceXAI's newest frontier model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, at half the context price of rivals.

Visit official page →

About

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's latest general-purpose model — a larger base model served at the same price and speed as Grok 4.6. It targets coding and agentic workflows with a 500K-token context window and a long-context price tier above 200K tokens.

Note: xAI was acquired by SpaceX in February 2026 and rebranded to SpaceXAI in July 2026; x.ai now serves the SpaceXAI site. Benchmarks below are provider-claimed and independently unverified.

Specs

Context window

500,000 tokens (long-context rates apply above 200K-token prompts)

Pricing

$2 input / $6 output per 1M tokens (short-context tier).

Free quota

None published.

API access

SpaceXAI API (formerly xAI API), third-party gateways

Weights

Closed — API only

Released

September 25, 2026

Benchmarks

xAI-reported (provider-claimed, independently unverified):

  • CursorBench 4.0: 46.3%
  • LatchBio biosafety benchmark: 62.4%

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

chatcodereasoningsearchautomation

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Established provider with clear, simple pricing and a large context window at aggressive rates. Benchmarks are entirely provider-claimed with no independent replication found, and there is no published free tier. The SpaceX acquisition adds some corporate-structure uncertainty, but the API product line is stable.

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
8.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
9.0/10
Openness · license + docs
5.1/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
8.0/10
  • · provider-tier estimate — thinner evidence (no public adoption metric)
  • · released 18 days ago
  • · manual review: Vending-Bench unverified; benchmark cherry-picking possible

Sources