Claude Opus 4.5
The first model to break 80% on SWE-bench Verified — Anthropic's 2025 flagship for coding, agents, and computer use
About
Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic's late-2025 flagship and the model that made "80% on SWE-bench Verified" a reality: 80.9% on the benchmark, first place across frontier models at launch, plus leads on SWE-bench Multilingual in 7 of 8 languages.
The other headline is efficiency: a new effort parameter lets developers trade reasoning depth for cost — at medium effort it matches Sonnet 4.5's best SWE-bench score with 76% fewer output tokens, and at max effort it beats Sonnet 4.5 by 4.3 points using 48% fewer tokens (Anthropic-reported). It also leads on computer use (OSWorld) and agent benchmarks (τ2-bench).
Priced at $5/$25 per 1M input/output tokens — a 66% cut from Opus 4.1's $15/$75 — it became Anthropic's workhorse for Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and enterprise agents. It has since been superseded by Opus 4.6/4.7 at the same price, but remains the historical reference point for the 80% barrier.
Specs
Context window
Pricing
Free quota
API access
Weights
Released
Benchmarks
Provider-reported (Anthropic, launch announcement):
- SWE-bench Verified: 80.9% — first model above 80%
- SWE-bench Multilingual: leads in 7 of 8 languages
- OSWorld (computer use): 66.3% — best-in-class at launch
- Medium effort: matches Sonnet 4.5's best SWE-bench with 76% fewer output tokens
Third-party coverage: TokenMix (2026-04-25) verified the figures against Anthropic's release notes and documents the 4.x family evolution; broad press coverage (CNBC, TechCrunch, Nov 2025) corroborates the launch, pricing cut, and coding-leadership claims. No independent re-run of Anthropic's exact benchmark numbers was found.
Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.
Use cases
Trust score — 8/10
Scored 8/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: provider-tier estimate — thinner evidence (no public adoption metric); Anthropic flagship; no public adoption metric; released 323 days ago. Manual review: superseded by newer generations but supported with pinned snapshots; benchmark charts vendor-reported. License: closed weights.
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 9.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 7.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 5.1/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 9.0/10
- · provider-tier estimate — thinner evidence (no public adoption metric)
- · Anthropic flagship; no public adoption metric
- · released 323 days ago
- · manual review: superseded by newer generations but supported with pinned snapshots; benchmark charts vendor-reported