Skip to content
← Models
Open weightsWenhao Chai et al./10 trustVerified

AuroraCap

A 7B video captioner that writes long, structured, human-readable video descriptions — a simple LLaVA-style design plus frame-wise token merging keeps long videos cheap, and it ships with VDC, a new benchmark built specifically for detailed captioning.

Visit official page →

About

AuroraCap (ICLR 2025, arXiv 2410.03051) is a video captioner aimed at a gap in the field: most video-caption benchmarks reward one-sentence summaries, so models trained on them produce thin descriptions. AuroraCap is built on a deliberately simple recipe — a CLIP ViT-H visual encoder plus Vicuna-1.5-7B, with no extra temporal-modeling parameters — and handles long frame sequences with token merging, keeping only about 10% of visual tokens in the final training stage with little quality loss. It was trained in three stages on 20M+ image/video-text pairs, with the training datasets released on Hugging Face. Alongside the model, the authors released VDC, a benchmark of 1,000+ carefully structured human captions, and VDCscore, an LLM-assisted metric that breaks long-caption evaluation into short QA pairs and correlates better with human Elo rankings. On classic captioning benchmarks it reports a Flickr30k CIDEr of 88.9 and MSR-VTT CIDEr of 33.1 (all author-reported). There is no hosted API; you self-host the weights.

Specs

Context window

Video frames sampled at 2 FPS with frame-wise token merging (about 10% of visual tokens kept in the final training stage); no single published max-duration figure.

Pricing

Free / open weights

Free quota

Fully open — weights and training data on Hugging Face; self-host, no registration

API access

No hosted API — self-host; weights on Hugging Face (wchai/AuroraCap-* releases tagged Apache 2.0)

Weights

Open weights

Released

Not disclosed

Benchmarks

  • Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9 (author-reported; vs GPT-4V 55.3, Gemini-1.5-Pro 82.2 on the same benchmark)\n- MSR-VTT CIDEr 33.1, VATEX CIDEr 33.8, zero-shot (author-reported)\n- Video QA: ActivityNet-QA accuracy 61.8, iVQA 55.2 (author-reported)\n- Introduced the VDC detailed-captioning benchmark (1,000+ structured human captions) plus the VDCscore metric, validated against human Elo rankings\n- No independent replication of any benchmark figure found

Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.

Use cases

video-captioningdense-video-captioningvideo-summarizationvideo-retrievalaccessibilitytraining-data-generation

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 8/10 (TIER verified, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed at ICLR 2025; public weights on Hugging Face tagged Apache 2.0; training data and the VDC benchmark released; strong reported numbers (Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9). Strengths: a real contribution to detailed captioning with its own benchmark and evaluation metric, plus honest ablations showing token merging barely hurts quality. Docked for: (1) every benchmark figure is author-reported with no independent replication found; (2) the official code repository is hard to locate — the paper says code is released but no clearly published GitHub path was verifiable. License: Apache 2.0 (HF release tag).

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
7.0/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
7.0/10
Openness · license + docs
9.0/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
8.0/10
  • · ICLR 2025 peer-reviewed; public weights, training data and the VDC benchmark released.
  • · Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9, MSR-VTT CIDEr 33.1 (all author-reported, no independent replication found).
  • · Token-merging design keeps ~10% of visual tokens with little quality loss (ablated in paper).

Sources