AuroraCap
A 7B video captioner that writes long, structured, human-readable video descriptions — a simple LLaVA-style design plus frame-wise token merging keeps long videos cheap, and it ships with VDC, a new benchmark built specifically for detailed captioning.
About
AuroraCap (ICLR 2025, arXiv 2410.03051) is a video captioner aimed at a gap in the field: most video-caption benchmarks reward one-sentence summaries, so models trained on them produce thin descriptions. AuroraCap is built on a deliberately simple recipe — a CLIP ViT-H visual encoder plus Vicuna-1.5-7B, with no extra temporal-modeling parameters — and handles long frame sequences with token merging, keeping only about 10% of visual tokens in the final training stage with little quality loss. It was trained in three stages on 20M+ image/video-text pairs, with the training datasets released on Hugging Face. Alongside the model, the authors released VDC, a benchmark of 1,000+ carefully structured human captions, and VDCscore, an LLM-assisted metric that breaks long-caption evaluation into short QA pairs and correlates better with human Elo rankings. On classic captioning benchmarks it reports a Flickr30k CIDEr of 88.9 and MSR-VTT CIDEr of 33.1 (all author-reported). There is no hosted API; you self-host the weights.
Specs
Context window
Pricing
Free quota
API access
Weights
Released
Benchmarks
- Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9 (author-reported; vs GPT-4V 55.3, Gemini-1.5-Pro 82.2 on the same benchmark)\n- MSR-VTT CIDEr 33.1, VATEX CIDEr 33.8, zero-shot (author-reported)\n- Video QA: ActivityNet-QA accuracy 61.8, iVQA 55.2 (author-reported)\n- Introduced the VDC detailed-captioning benchmark (1,000+ structured human captions) plus the VDCscore metric, validated against human Elo rankings\n- No independent replication of any benchmark figure found
Provider-reported unless a source says otherwise. Benchmarks are marketing-adjacent by nature — treat them as directional.
Use cases
Trust score — 8/10
Scored 8/10 (TIER verified, metrics-v1). Evidence: peer-reviewed at ICLR 2025; public weights on Hugging Face tagged Apache 2.0; training data and the VDC benchmark released; strong reported numbers (Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9). Strengths: a real contribution to detailed captioning with its own benchmark and evaluation metric, plus honest ablations showing token merging barely hurts quality. Docked for: (1) every benchmark figure is author-reported with no independent replication found; (2) the official code repository is hard to locate — the paper says code is released but no clearly published GitHub path was verifiable. License: Apache 2.0 (HF release tag).
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 7.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 7.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 9.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 8.0/10
- · ICLR 2025 peer-reviewed; public weights, training data and the VDC benchmark released.
- · Flickr30k CIDEr 88.9, MSR-VTT CIDEr 33.1 (all author-reported, no independent replication found).
- · Token-merging design keeps ~10% of visual tokens with little quality loss (ablated in paper).