
vLex
Global legal intelligence with Vincent AI research assistant.
Acquired — still operating
acquired by Clio 2025 ($1B)
About
vLex is a legal intelligence platform covering 100+ countries with over a billion cases, statutes, and regulations, now powered by the Vincent AI research assistant. Vincent answers natural-language questions with citation-backed answers, drafts first-cut research memos, builds arguments, and can surface persuasive authorities from other jurisdictions.
Clio acquired vLex for $1 billion in 2025, folding Vincent into its practice platform used by 200,000+ legal professionals. It is strongest for cross-border and multilingual research; US-only practitioners may find domestic incumbents comparable.
What it can do
- Vincent AI citation-backed legal Q&A
- Cross-jurisdictional case recommendations
- Document analysis and argument building
- Litigation intelligence (judges, counsel, outcomes)
Setup
- Sign up at vlex.com or through Clio.
- Ask Vincent natural-language research questions.
- Upload documents to find supporting or opposing authorities.
- Use litigation intelligence to profile judges and opposing counsel.
Prerequisites
A legal professional or firm; subscription required.
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 9/10
Scored 9/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: 1B+ documents across 100+ countries — company-reported; Acquired by Clio for $1B in 2025; Vincent AI research assistant; Strongest for cross-border/multilingual research. License: Proprietary SaaS..
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 9.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 9.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 5.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 8.0/10
- · 1B+ documents across 100+ countries — company-reported
- · Acquired by Clio for $1B in 2025; Vincent AI research assistant
- · Strongest for cross-border/multilingual research
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.