Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolTextio/10 trustVerified

Textio

Augmented writing that makes job posts attract more qualified, diverse applicants.

Visit official site →

About

Textio, founded in 2014 in Seattle, is an augmented-writing platform for hiring content. It scores job descriptions as you write, predicts how they will perform in the hiring market, and suggests language changes to remove gendered or exclusionary phrasing and improve clarity. The company says its models analyze hundreds of millions of job posts, and it offers deeper checks for ageism, disability inclusion, and neurodiversity. Textio also covers performance feedback writing for managers, and integrates with Greenhouse, Workday, iCIMS, Oracle, and SAP SuccessFactors. Pricing is not published; SelectHub lists around $15,000 per year, while one directory mentions subscriptions from $99/month — a wide enough spread to confirm directly. Limitations: suggestions can feel formulaic, templates are hard to tailor to unusual roles, analysis is mainly English, and the interface has a learning curve for new users.

What it can do

  • Real-time writing guidance; Textio Score predictions; bias and inclusion analysis; performance feedback coaching; ATS integrations; language analytics dashboard.

Setup

Connect your ATS; install the browser extension or editor integration; set brand and tone guidance.

Prerequisites

Active job postings; ATS access for the deepest integrations.

Use cases

Writing inclusive job descriptionsRemoving biased language from hiring contentManager guidance on performance reviewsEmployer-brand language consistency

Works with

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 8/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Augmented writing for job descriptions with bias analysis, founded 2014 in Seattle, Greenhouse/Workday/iCIMS integrations confirmed across SelectHub, Ongig, and directories.; Pricing not published; SelectHub cites ~$15,000/yr while another directory mentions $99/mo+ — conflict disclosed..

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.