text-to-cad
Give your agent CAD superpowers — text-to-CAD tooling for AI agents.
About
text-to-cad gives AI agents CAD superpowers: natural-language descriptions in, CAD geometry out. It ranked #10 on GitHub's weekly trending and was highlighted in the week's viral-repos roundups, a sign that agent tooling is pushing past software into hardware and design workflows. Text-to-CAD is a genuinely hard problem — parametric precision matters, and a pretty render that doesn't satisfy constraints is useless — so the interesting question is how it handles dimensions, tolerances, and export to real CAD formats. Worth a look for anyone exploring agents in engineering and manufacturing workflows.
What it can do
- Natural-language to CAD geometry generation
- Agent-compatible interface
- Export to standard CAD formats (verify per docs)
Setup
- Clone https://github.com/earthtojake/text-to-cad and follow the README.
- Describe the part you want in natural language.
- Export and verify dimensions in your CAD tool before manufacturing anything.
Prerequisites
A CAD tool for verifying output; an LLM/agent backend per the docs.
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 5/10
Scored 6/10 (METRICS tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: #10 on weekly trending plus viral-roundup coverage shows real interest; the agent-to-CAD bridge is a legitimate unsolved workflow. Docked for: (1) geometric precision and constraint handling are unverified — critical for CAD; (2) no published accuracy evaluation; (3) young project with unknown maintenance cadence. License: check repo (open-source).
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 7.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 6.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 8.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 6.0/10
- · #10 GitHub weekly trending; viral-roundup coverage
- · Agent-to-CAD bridge is a legitimate unsolved workflow
- · manual review: geometric precision and constraint handling unverified — critical for CAD
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.