Sitechecker
Site audits plus continuous monitoring with change alerts
About
Sitechecker is a site-audit and monitoring platform built for teams that want continuous oversight, not one-off crawls: its JavaScript-rendering crawler checks 100+ (provider-claimed 300+) technical and on-page issues, scores site health, attaches how-to-fix guidance, and re-audits on a schedule (weekly on Basic, daily on Standard, every 12 hours on Premium) with page-level change alerts and an API on every tier. Plans run $99–$449/month with unlimited users per plan and GA4/Search Console integration. Reviewers call it a good second-opinion crawler but note audit depth sits behind dedicated desktop crawlers and issue lists get noisy on large sites.
What it can do
- javascript-rendering crawler
- 300+ technical seo checks (provider-claimed)
- scheduled re-audits with change alerts
- rank tracking
- backlink monitoring
- ga4 and search console integration
- api on every plan
- white-label pdf reports
- slack alerts
Setup
Sign up at sitechecker.pro; free homepage check and Chrome extension need no account.
Prerequisites
A web browser; websites to monitor.
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 7/10
Scored 7/10 (METRICS tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: actively developed through 2026, API on every plan, unlimited users, free public checker, consistent reviewer coverage. Strengths: monitoring-first workflow with change alerts, JS-rendering crawler, automation-friendly. Docked for: (1) closed crawler — issue-detection claims are provider-claimed; (2) higher entry price than peers with similar audit depth; (3) 48-hour refund window only. License: commercial, proprietary.
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 7.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 8.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 3.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 7.0/10
- · monitoring-first workflow with change alerts
- · JS-rendering crawler
- · 48-hour refund window only
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.