Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolDeemos/10 trustMetrics-checked

Hyper3D Rodin

Text-to-3D by Deemos — production-ready quad meshes and PBR materials in minutes.

Visit official site →

About

Rodin is the flagship 3D generative AI tool from Deemos Technologies (影眸科技), a Shanghai company founded in 2020, built on its Hyper3D platform. Rodin Gen-1.5 (launched April 2025) is a native 3D model with 4B+ parameters that generates clean quadrilateral meshes with PBR materials directly from text or image prompts — fixing the thin-face and edge-sharpness problems that plagued earlier AI 3D. Gen-2 (October 2025) scaled to 10B parameters on a new architecture with even cleaner topology. The platform adds 3D ControlNet (bounding boxes, voxels, point clouds), LoRA style modules, multi-material support, and APIs plus integrations for Blender, Unity, and Unreal Engine.

The honest picture: Rodin produces some of the most pipeline-ready AI meshes available — models in ~40 seconds that need far less cleanup than competitors — but hero assets still need artist touch-up. Pricing sits around $30/mo tiers with a free trial, and as a Chinese company, enterprise buyers with strict data-residency requirements should review the terms. For game devs, VFX artists, and product visualizers who need textured 3D fast, it's among the best text-to-3D options in production today.

What it can do

  • Text-to-3D and image-to-3D generation
  • Clean quad meshes with PBR materials
  • 3D ControlNet and LoRA style control
  • Multi-material support
  • Blender, Unity, and Unreal integrations

Setup

Sign up on the Hyper3D platform, describe or upload a reference, generate the mesh, then refine and export to Blender, Unity, or Unreal.

Prerequisites

Hyper3D/Rodin account; a 3D package (Blender, Unity, Unreal) for final integration.

Use cases

3d-generationgame-devtext-to-3d

Works with

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Verified via vendor site/docs/GitHub and reputable coverage, wave 55; Trending score 72/100 from researcher assessment.

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.