
RankIQ
AI SEO reports and content grading built for bloggers.
About
RankIQ is an AI-powered SEO toolset made by blogger Brandon Gaille for bloggers. Its core is a hand-curated keyword library covering 200+ blog niches with low-competition keywords, plus an AI SEO report and content optimizer that scores drafts against the pages already ranking.
The focused scope is the selling point: no backlink graphs or site audits to learn, just keyword to graded draft. The trade-off is real too — keyword data is US-centric, there is no rank tracking or technical audit, and at $49/month it only makes sense if the blog earns.
What it can do
- Hand-curated keyword library (200+ niches)
- AI SEO report from top-ranking pages
- Content optimizer with letter-grade scoring
- Title analyzer and content planner
Setup
- Create an account at rankiq.com and pick a plan.
- Choose your blog niche to unlock its keyword library.
- Pick a keyword and run an AI SEO report.
- Write or paste your draft and raise the content grade.
Prerequisites
A blog or content site; paid plan (from $49/month, no free trial).
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 6/10
Scored 6/10 (metrics tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: niche leader for blogger SEO; independent reviews (TechRadar, bestfreeaitools); 1-year Mediavine study cited 468% more traffic growth for users (vendor-cited study); no release cadence data — neutral maintenance score; closed SaaS, no public API; US-centric keyword data. License: Proprietary SaaS, closed source..
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 7.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 7.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 3.0/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 7.0/10
- · niche leader for blogger SEO; independent reviews (TechRadar, bestfreeaitools)
- · 1-year Mediavine study cited 468% more traffic growth for users (vendor-cited study)
- · no release cadence data — neutral maintenance score
- · closed SaaS, no public API; US-centric keyword data
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.