Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolPillar/10 trustVerified

Pillar

Interview intelligence focused on structured, equitable hiring.

Visit official site →

About

Pillar is an interview intelligence platform that records and transcribes interviews, scores responses against competency rubrics, and generates bias reports that flag non-job-related conversation topics or inconsistent scoring patterns across interviewers. It ships in-interview guides to keep sessions structured, plus question banks, automated feedback, and playback review. Integrations include Greenhouse, Lever, Workday Extend, Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, and directory listings report an API. Pricing is inconsistent across third-party directories — listings range from roughly $39 to $49 per month to team-based quotes available on request — so buyers should confirm current pricing directly. G2 ratings sit around 4.9/5 on a small review base, per a 2026 roundup. Limitations: the equity and bias-reporting features are only as good as the rubrics teams configure, and smaller teams may find dedicated interview-intelligence tooling heavier than a simple notetaker.

What it can do

  • Interview recording and transcription; rubric-based scoring; bias and equity reports; in-interview guides; question banks; automated feedback; ATS and calendar integrations.

Setup

Connect your ATS and video conferencing; configure rubrics and question banks; invite interviewers.

Prerequisites

Greenhouse, Lever, or another supported ATS for full workflow sync.

Use cases

Structured interviews with competency rubricsBias monitoring across interviewersInterview recording and playback reviewInterviewer training and preparation

Works with

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 7/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Interview intelligence with rubric scoring and bias/equity reports, Greenhouse/Lever integrations confirmed across interview-software roundups and directory listings.; Pricing conflicts across directories ($39/mo vs $49/mo vs quote-based) disclosed; G2 4.9/5 on a small review base noted as thin evidence..

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.