Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolBraintrust/10 trustMetrics-checked
Braintrust logo

Braintrust

Developer-centric LLM evals and observability with CI/CD gating.

Visit official site →

About

Braintrust is a developer-centric evaluation and observability platform: datasets, scorers, and experiments with GitHub Action integration that can gate PRs on score drops — the closest thing in this batch to eval-driven CI. Also offers agent evaluation workflows.

Free tier: 1 GB data/mo, 10k scores, 1M spans, 14-day retention; metered overage. The braintrust-proxy repo is MIT but small — the platform is the real product. Funded ($30M+ valuation cited in third-party comparisons).

What it can do

  • Datasets, scorers, and experiments
  • CI/CD gating via GitHub Action
  • Agent evaluation workflows
  • 1M spans/mo on free tier
  • Collaborative eval workflows

Setup

  1. Sign up at braintrust.dev.
  2. Install the SDK (pip install braintrust / npm).
  3. Log spans and define scorers in code.
  4. Add the GitHub Action to gate PRs on eval regressions.

Prerequisites

Braintrust account (free tier); API key.

Use cases

codeautomation

Works with

Generic APIAny agent (.md)

Trust score — 7/10

/10 trustMetrics-checked

Scored 7/10 (metrics tier). Strong developer-experience story (CI gating is genuinely differentiating) with a usable free tier, but closed SaaS and the open repo is a thin proxy — most evidence is vendor or third-party-comparison sourced. Metrics tier.

★ 412 GitHub stars

How the trust score is built

Full methodology →
Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
5.3/10
Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
5.7/10
Openness · license + docs
9.4/10
Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
8.0/10
  • · 412 GitHub stars (log-scaled vs catalog peers)
  • · last push 42d ago; 0 releases/12mo; 12 open issues
  • · manual review: developer-centric evals with CI/CD gating; proxy repo is small — platform is the product; license: MIT (proxy repo; platform closed SaaS)

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.